Hello,

Sign up to join our community!

Welcome Back,

Please sign in to your account!

Forgot Password,

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

You must login to ask a question.

You must login to send a message.

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

  1. 🔍 Question Type Inference / Interpretation of Response We are asked to determine what Ms. Siuzdak’s reply shows she understood Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply. 🧩 Breakdown of Stimulus Mr. Janeck’s Claim: Stevenson is unlikely to win because voters hesitate to elect a businessman without political experRead more

    🔍 Question Type

    Inference / Interpretation of Response
    We are asked to determine what Ms. Siuzdak’s reply shows she understood Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply.

    đź§© Breakdown of Stimulus

    • Mr. Janeck’s Claim: Stevenson is unlikely to win because voters hesitate to elect a businessman without political experience.
    • Ms. Siuzdak’s Reply: Running a corporation equips a person with skills relevant to governing a state.

    Notice: Mr. Janeck makes a prediction about voter behavior. Ms. Siuzdak responds as if he made a judgment on Stevenson’s suitability. The gap between prediction and evaluation is the crux of the question.

    đź§  Reasoning Approach

    1. Identify the focus of each speaker:
      • Janeck → Voter tendencies (external).
      • Siuzdak → Candidate qualifications (internal).
    2. Recognize the misinterpretation: Siuzdak takes Janeck’s remark as though he doubts Stevenson’s qualifications.
    3. Evaluate answer choices to see which captures this misinterpretation.

    📊 Answer Choice Analysis

    • (A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governor.
      ✅ Correct. This matches Siuzdak’s response: she argues business experience makes Stevenson qualified, which only makes sense if she interpreted Janeck’s remark as saying Stevenson is unqualified.
    • (B) No candidate without political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
      ❌ Too extreme. Janeck said few voters are willing, not that no one has ever been elected. Siuzdak’s reply does not assume such an absolute historical claim.
    • (C) Mr. Janeck believes that political leadership and business leadership are closely analogous.
      ❌ Opposite direction. Siuzdak argues that business prepares one for politics. Janeck never made any claim about analogies between leadership domains.
    • (D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one’s ability to run a state government fairly.
      ❌ Out of scope. Neither speaker mentions morality, fairness, or profit motives. The issue is purely experience versus qualification.
    • (E) Voters generally overestimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate.
      ❌ Misaligned. Janeck says voters hesitate to elect a candidate without political experience. That does not imply voters overestimate it — he simply reports their likely behavior. Siuzdak’s reply also does not address this.

    âś… Correct Answer

    (A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governor.

    ✨ Key Insights

    • Misinterpretation questions often involve one person’s prediction being taken as a value judgment by the other.
    • Eliminating wrong answers requires checking for:
      • Exaggeration (B)
      • Scope shifts (D, E)
      • Irrelevant analogies (C)
    • The best answer is the one that aligns with how the second speaker framed their response.

    📝 Replicable Template

    1. Question Type – Clarify what kind of CR question it is.
    2. Breakdown of Stimulus – Summarize key claims by each party.
    3. Reasoning Approach – Outline logical steps to reach the answer.
    4. Option-by-Option Analysis – Justify correct choice and systematically rule out others.
    5. Final Answer – Clearly state the correct option.
    6. Key Insights – Highlight transferable reasoning strategies.

     

    See less
  2. The theoretical answer is yes, but such an apparatus would be enormous, heavy, and use a huge amount of power.

    The theoretical answer is yes, but such an apparatus would be enormous, heavy, and use a huge amount of power.

    See less
  3. Many many years ago I interviewed for a job in a non profit in Washington, D.C. My prospective boss asked me to go out to lunch and my choices were the expensive restaurant next door or a cafeteria at NEA. I chose the former. Yes I got the job, but I later found out I almost didn’t because I had stuRead more

    Many many years ago I interviewed for a job in a non profit in Washington, D.C. My prospective boss asked me to go out to lunch and my choices were the expensive restaurant next door or a cafeteria at NEA. I chose the former.

    Yes I got the job, but I later found out I almost didn’t because I had stupidly forgotten this was a NONPROFIT with a limited budget and I should have been more sensitive to this.

    Why did I get the job? I was red haired, boss’s daughters had red hair, and this was a mitigating factor. When I walked into the office on the first day of work, his secretary AND administrative assistant were red haired.

    Moral to story: Order somewhere in the middle. Avoid all traps.

    See less
  4. Wish I could say Scuppernong grapes, my favorite food in all the world, but we share those with a bordering state which also shares part of our name. We did discover this unique variant of the muscadine…all the grapes come from the mother stem. More argument for Livermush, a delectable variant of scRead more

    Wish I could say Scuppernong grapes, my favorite food in all the world, but we share those with a bordering state which also shares part of our name. We did discover this unique variant of the muscadine…all the grapes come from the mother stem.

    More argument for Livermush, a delectable variant of scrapple. Come to one of the Livermush festivals to sample it. BUT oh dear a very nice company in the adjoining state Elvis called home makes it too.

    That leaves our one clear claim to fame, an addictive red beverage called Cheerwine. Not wine, just a plain cherry soda.

    See less
  5. You probably can. Check with the individual college. Each college or college system can usually set their own rules as far as whether or not they have a minimum age. Ironically my son, who took his first college course after high school freshman year, took a regular course at a college that didn’t hRead more

    You probably can. Check with the individual college. Each college or college system can usually set their own rules as far as whether or not they have a minimum age. Ironically my son, who took his first college course after high school freshman year, took a regular course at a college that didn’t have a minimum age limit BECAUSE he was rejected at a college program for high school students that wouldn’t admit students who hadn’t completed grade 11.

    Also check or have your parents check the policies in your school district. Many are required to pay for your college course if you’re qualified to take it and the school doesn’t offer it.

    Also note that many big name universities offer online classes, including the Ivy League universities, and completing a course at a better college will be more meaningful than a course taken at a community college with respect to college admissions.

    See less
  6. By either doing a job and to be utilizin’ it OR use it additionally like I do - Home Projects, Process Improvements and other Tech Projects at Home.

    By either doing a job and to be utilizin’ it OR use it additionally like I do – Home Projects, Process Improvements and other Tech Projects at Home.

    See less
  7. I would first recommend that you look up the phrase “bad picker.” The way I\'ve heard it explained by a therapist is that all people have different “attachment styles.” That would also be a good term to look up. It all seems to boil down to emotional and social dysfunctions that we develop during chRead more

    I would first recommend that you look up the phrase “bad picker.” The way I\’ve heard it explained by a therapist is that all people have different “attachment styles.” That would also be a good term to look up. It all seems to boil down to emotional and social dysfunctions that we develop during childhood. This is hard to undo for two main reasons:

    1. Our bad pickers are ingrained from an early age. Poor boundaries are a major part of this.
    2. People with emotional and social issues often don\’t want to seek therapy. This is for a variety of reasons. The more their friends tell them to change, etc., the more stubborn they may become.

    Sometimes, when someone is finally a miserable, broken mess, and have nowhere to turn, they\’ll get therapy, start to uncover their issues, and develop better emotional intelligence so that they are drawn to better romantic partners and stop sabotaging healthy relationships.

    See less